Subscribe

DOI:

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in degenerated aortic bioprostheses via transfemoral access with the Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve

Kupatt C., Greif M., Lange P., Schmitz C., Steinbeck G.

Single and multicentre TAVI registries

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in degenerated aortic bioprostheses via transfemoral access with the Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve

Aims: Surgical treatment of degenerated aortic bioprostheses is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients with significant comorbidities. Therefore, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) performed as valve-in-valve (VIV) technique appears as an attractive alternative treatment option. We report on a case series of seven patients with dysfunctional bioprosthetic aortic heart valves who have been treated with TAVI via transfemoral access.

Methods and results: Valve-in-valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN XT bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA) was performed in eight patients (three men, five women, mean age 85.3±6.1 years) with a high operative risk (logistic EuroSCORE 27.2±7.3). Six patients underwent TAVI because of high-grade stenosis of the aortic bioprosthesis, whereas two patients presented with a high-grade regurgitation. All patients suffered from NYHA Class III-IV dyspnoea during admission. TAVI was successfully performed via transfemoral access under local anaesthesia with mild analgesic medication in all cases. Mild aortic regurgitation occurred in three patients while no permanent pacemaker implantation was required. Major cardiac events or cerebrovascular events did not occur. One aneurysm spurium, with the need of one blood transfusion, occurred. All patients improved at least one NYHA Class within 30 days.

Conclusions: TAVI for degenerated aortic bioprostheses, using the Edwards SAPIEN XT valve via transfemoral access is a feasible option for patients at high surgical risk.

Volume 8 Supplement Q
Sep 30, 2012
Volume 8 Supplement Q
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV11I11A255 Feb 12, 2016
Edwards SAPIEN 3 implanted in a failing aortic bioprosthesis: first report
Molina-Martin de Nicolas J et al
free

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00578 Mar 20, 2018
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation into a novel, sutureless bioprosthesis: technical considerations
Andreas M et al
free
Chat with Cory
Hello , I'm Cory and I will do my best to answer your questions about this article. Please remember that this is an experimental feature, and that I'm still learning.
How did the patients' clinical status and functional class change after the TAVI procedures?
What are the potential advantages of the TAVI approach compared to surgical treatment for degenerated aortic bioprostheses in high-risk patients?
How does the feasibility and safety of the transfemoral TAVI approach compare to other access routes for valve-in-valve procedures?
How do the findings of this study compare to previous reports on valve-in-valve TAVI procedures?
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved