Subscribe

DOI:

Impact of post-procedural aortic regurgitation on mortality after TAVI

Hayashida K., Lefèvre T., Chevalier B., Hovasse T., Romano M., Garot P., Watanabe Y., Bouvier E., Farge A., Donzeau-Gouge P., Cormier B., Morice M-C

Treatment and consequences of regurgitation during transcatheter valve therapies

Impact of post-procedural aortic regurgitation on mortality after TAVI

Aims: Post-procedural aortic regurgitation (post-AR) is known to be associated with poor short-term to mid-term outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of mild post-AR on clinical outcomes.

Methods and results: We compared clinical outcomes in 400 consecutive TAVI recipients according to post-AR grade: none (group 1=74.8%), mild (group 2=22.2%) or moderate to severe (group 3=3.0%). The mean age was similar in the three groups (83.4±6.1 years) as well as logistic EuroSCORE (22.5±11.4, 24.5±11.6 and 21.5±9.4%, p=0.28) and annulus size (22.0±1.8, 22.2±2.1 and 22.5±2.1 mm, p=0.53). The Edwards valve was the most frequently used in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (89.3, 78.7 and 83.3%, p=0.03) and the implanted valve size was similar in all groups (25.6±2.0, 25.4±2.2 and 25.5±2.2 mm, respectively, p=0.69). Post-dilatation was required more frequently in group 3 (4.7, 24.1 and 50.0% respectively, p<0.01). Post-procedural increase in mitral regurgitation was in line with the post-AR grade (0.78±0.73, 1.22±0.80 and 1.89±0.78, respectively, p<0.01). Despite the absence of difference in 30-day mortality, longer-term outcome was significantly poorer in patients with mild AR than in those with no AR (log-rank p<0.01), albeit better than in patients with moderate to severe AR regardless of TAVI type and left ventricular function. In group 2 (mild, post-AR), patients with no pre-procedural AR had worse outcome compared to those who had pre-procedural AR (log-rank p=0.01). Post-AR was also identified as an independent predictor of mid-term to long-term mortality (HR1.68, 95% CI: 1.21-1.44, p<0.01).

Conclusions: Mild AR post TAVI is associated with a worse outcome when compared to no AR. Careful valve selection and post-dilatation when required to avoid mild post-AR might contribute to improved clinical outcome after TAVI.

Volume 8 Supplement Q
Sep 30, 2012
Volume 8 Supplement Q
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00784 May 15, 2022
Five-year outcomes of mild paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Okuno T et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11I10A220 Feb 19, 2016
Accurate procedural assessment of AR – critical for successful TAVI
Kapadia S and Tuzcu ME
free

10.4244/EIJV8SQA7 Sep 30, 2012
Prognostic impact of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Jilaihawi H and Makkar R
free

10.4244/EIJV8SQA8 Sep 30, 2012
Treatment and prevention of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Hayashida K and Lefèvre T
free
Chat with Cory
Hello , I'm Cory and I will do my best to answer your questions about this article. Please remember that this is an experimental feature, and that I'm still learning.
What were the three groups based on the severity of post-procedural aortic regurgitation?
^What was the difference in longer-term outcome between patients with mild AR and no AR?
^What was the difference in outcome between patients with mild AR and no pre-procedural AR versus those with pre-procedural AR?
^What was the 30-day mortality rate across the groups?
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved