Subscribe

DOI:

The effect of repeated ischaemic periods on left ventricular dynamics during percutaneous coronary intervention

Maurice Remmelink, MD, PhD; Robbert J. de Winter, MD, PhD; José P.S. Henriques, MD, PhD; Karel T. Koch, MD, PhD; René J. van der Schaaf, MD; Marije M. Vis, MD; Jan G.P. Tijssen, PhD; Jan J. Piek; MD, PhD; Jan Baan Jr.*, MD, PhD

References

Volume 6 Number 5
Nov 15, 2010
Volume 6 Number 5
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00988 Apr 2, 2021
Optimising physiological endpoints of percutaneous coronary intervention
Al-Lamee R et al
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00818 Aug 4, 2017
Microvascular dysfunction following ST-elevation myocardial infarction and its recovery over time
Hassell M et al
free

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01109 Sep 20, 2018
Haemodynamic impact of a new pulsatile mechanical circulatory support in high-risk coronary stenting
Bastos M et al
free
Chat with Cory
Hello , I'm Cory and I will do my best to answer your questions about this article. Please remember that this is an experimental feature, and that I'm still learning.
What was the difference in the response to the first and second coronary occlusions in terms of left ventricular function?
What were the limitations of the study and what further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms?
What were the key parameters used to assess left ventricular function and how did they change in response to the ischemic insults?
What was the rationale for studying the effects of consecutive coronary occlusions during the percutaneous intervention procedure?
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved