Subscribe

DOI:

Concept of the central clip: when to use one or two Mitraclips®

Alegria E.1, Chan P.H.1, Syrseloudis D.1, Tavazzi G.1, Price S.1, Lindsay A.C.1, Duncan A.1, Moat N.1, Di Mario C.1, Franzen O.W.2

Pot-pourri

Concept of the central clip: when to use one or two Mitraclips®

Aims: Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with the MitraClip® was shown to be a safe and feasible alternative compared to conventional surgical mitral valve repair. We analyse the concept of the central clip and the predictors of the need for more than one Mitraclip® in our high-risk surgical population with severe mitral regurgitation (MR).

Methods and results: Patients with severe MR (3 or 4+) and high operative risk (as defined by logistic EuroSCORE) declined for conventional mitral valve repair were considered for the MitraClip®. The procedure was performed under general anaesthesia with transoesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Device success was defined as placement of one or more MitraClips® with a reduction of MR to ≤2+. Patients were followed up clinically and with transthoracic echocardiography at one month and at one year. From September 2009 to March 2012, 43 patients with severe MR with a mean age of 74.8±10.7 years (30 males and 13 females; mean log EuroSCORE 24.1±11, mean LVEF 47.5±18.5%; mean±SD) were treated. Median follow-up was 385 days (104-630; Q1-Q3). Device implantation success was 93%. All patients were treated following the central clip concept. Concerning the MR itself, 52.5% was degenerative in aetiology and 47.5% was functional. The degree of MR was reduced from 3.6±0.4 to 1.4±0.6 (p<0.001); NYHA Class improved from 3.1±0.4 to 1.8±0.7 (p<0.001). Nineteen patients (47.5%) received two or more clips. Vena contracta (p<0.001) and the presence of two broad jets (p<0.001) were correlated with the need for a second clip. The presence of a restricted posterior mitral valve leaflet (PML) was inversely correlated with the need for more than one clip (p=0.02). A cut-off value of ≥7.5 mm for vena contracta predicted the need for a second clip (sensitivity 83%, specificity 90%, p=0.01).

Conclusions: The central MitraClip® concept achieved a significant reduction in the degree of mitral regurgitation in the majority of patients treated. The presence of a broad jet (quantified by a vena contracta greater than 7.5 mm) significantly predicted the need for more than one clip.

Volume 8 Supplement Q
Sep 30, 2012
Volume 8 Supplement Q
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV11SWA11 Sep 17, 2015
The MitraClip transcatheter mitral valve repair system
Grasso C and Baldus S
free

10.4244/EIJV7I12A230 Apr 20, 2012
Tools and Techniques: Edge-to-edge percutaneous MitraClip® implantation
Alegria-Barrero E et al
free

10.4244/EIJV9I5A102 Sep 27, 2013
MitraClip® via direct right atrial access in case of a missing inferior vena cava
Frerker C et al
free

MITRAL VALVE INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJV12SYA14 Sep 18, 2016
The MitraClip system: strategies for optimal patient selection and optimised results
Grasso C and Ince H
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00883 Nov 20, 2020
Percutaneous mitral valve leaflet repair: ongoing directions and future perspectives
Maisano F and Taramasso M
free

10.4244/EIJV9I10A204 Feb 20, 2014
Concept of the central clip: when to use one or two MitraClips®
Alegria-Barrero E et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV12I8A173 Oct 10, 2016
Challenging mitral clefts with MitraClip: the convergent clips strategy
Taramasso M and Maisano F
free
Trending articles
69.996

10.4244/EIJV13I12A217 Dec 8, 2017
Swimming against the tide: insights from the ORBITA trial
Al-Lamee R and Francis D
free
59.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
57.6

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
38.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00912 Oct 7, 2024
Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention
Almajid F et al
free
15.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01050 Jul 15, 2024
Durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Ternacle J et al
free
Chat with Cory
Hello , I'm Cory and I will do my best to answer your questions about this article. Please remember that this is an experimental feature, and that I'm still learning.
How does the desired procedural outcome, such as the degree of regurgitation reduction, factor into the decision to use one or two Mitraclips?
How does the experience and expertise of the interventional cardiologist influence the decision-making process around the number of Mitraclips to use?
What are the long-term outcomes and durability of the Mitraclip procedure, and how do they differ between the use of one or two clips?
How does the Mitraclip procedure compare to other minimally invasive or surgical options for the treatment of mitral regurgitation, and how does the choice of one or two clips factor into these comparisons?
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved