Subscribe

Flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01034

First-in-human implantation of a customised balloon-expandable valve into a dysfunctional Tendyne valve

Paolo Denti1, MD; Matteo Saccocci1, MD; Nicola Buzzatti1, MD; Edoardo Zancanaro1, MD; Franscesco Maisano1, MD, FESC, FHFA

During the 4-year follow-up of a patient with a Tendyne valve (Abbott) implanted in 2019, the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) showed valve dysfunction with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) displayed multiple jets at the level of the outer frame, normal leaflet excursion, and no endocarditic foci. On a cardiac computed tomography (CT) scan, the Tendyne valve showed no structural anomalies and appeared normopositioned (Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Figure 2, Moving image 1).

Surgical intervention was excluded because of an extremely high operative risk, but even the transcatheter approach was challenging. A two-step strategy, involving the implantation of a covered stent followed by a SAPIEN 3 (S3 [Edwards Lifesciences]), would have led to a prolonged period of massive MR and haemodynamic instability. The implant of a standard S3 alone would have maintained a more stable positioning, but its upper free-flow segment would not permit leak closure. To overcome this issue, we decided to perform a direct valve-in-valve (ViV) procedure with a customised S3 (Figure 1), sewing a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch to cover the free-flow segment of the valve stent1. ViV implantation in the Tendyne valve remained challenging2, since the S3 valve needed to be crimped directly over the balloon, and to be sure that the nose cone entered the flower-shaped frame of the Tendyne, a double-wire strategy was necessary, with selective crossing of the same petal and ballooning prior to implantation. Furthermore, the Tendyne structure exposed the ViV procedure to the risk of S3 atrialisation during the final deployment. To test our potential solution, an in silico implant was performed using a three-dimensionally (3D) printed heart model based on the latest available CT scan acquisition (Supplementary Figure 3-Supplementary Figure 4-Supplementary Figure 5).

Under TOE guidance we performed a posterior-inferior transseptal puncture: the valve was crossed in the correct petal portion using an Agilis NxT catheter (Abbott) and a guidewire (Terumo). A Safari XS wire (Boston Scientific) was secured into the left ventricle (LV) and used to advance a 14 Fr Armada balloon (Abbott) for septostomy. A second wire was advanced through the septum into the left atrium (LA), and using an Agilis catheter, the valve was recrossed in the same petal to position the second Safari wire in the LV. Meanwhile, a customised 29 mm S3 valve was prepared as planned and then crimped directly onto the balloon of a standard Edwards Commander delivery system (Edwards Lifesciences). The system was advanced through the septum to the left atrium over the second Safari wire, using the “Buddy Balloon Technique” (BBT) with a 14 Fr Armada balloon that had previously been positioned. The BBT was also used to facilitate valve crossing and implantation of the S3. The modified S3 crossed the Tendyne without any impingement; the first Safari wire was removed. Under fluoroscopic and echo guidance, using rapid ventricular pacing, the S3 was implanted as deeply as possible (Supplementary Figure 6). However, as expected, the interaction with the Tendyne ventricular nitinol struts produced an “atrialisation” movement of the S3.

We optimised the implant with postdilatation, yet on the control TOE, the regurgitant jets, despite being reduced, appeared to still be significant. A second customised S3 prosthesis that had been crimped directly and even more distally onto the balloon was implanted; a slight atrialisation movement was present, but on the control TOE, the residual regurgitation was mild (Supplementary Figure 7).

Prior to discharge, the TTE showed a mitral transvalvular mean gradient of 3 mmHg, and at 6 months, the TTE revealed mild regurgitation (Supplementary Figure 8, Moving image 2-Moving image 3-Moving image 4).

Figure 1. S-Dyne procedure. A) Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) displaying severe regurgitation at the level of the outer frame with multiple jets, normal leaflet excursion, and no endocarditic foci. B) A 3D printed heart model based on the patient’s CT scan. C) The customised SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences) valve with a PTFE sutured neoskirt. D) The valve-in-valve procedure. E) Postoperative TOE findings with mild residual mitral regurgitation. 3D: three-dimensionally; CT: computed tomography; PTFE: polytetrafluoroethylene

Conflict of interest statement

P. Denti has received speaker honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences; and is a consultant for Pi-Cardia, InnovHeart, and Approximate Labs. F. Maisano reports grants and personal fees from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, NVT, Terumo, Perifect, Xeltis, Transseptal Solutions, Cardiovalve, Magenta, 4Tech, Coregard, SwissVortex, and Occlufit. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Moving image 1. Tendyne bioprosthesis normopositioned and functioning well when initially deployed.

Moving image 2. TOE showing severe regurgitation at the level of the outer frame with multiple jets, normal leaflet excursion, and no endocarditic foci.

Moving image 3. TOE direct comparison between pre- and postprocedural valve function.

Moving image 4. Recorded procedure.

Volume 20 Number 13
Jul 1, 2024
Volume 20 Number 13
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00426 Nov 17, 2023
Anterior mitral leaflet modification with endoscopic scissors during Tendyne implantation
Piayda K et al
free

MITRAL VALVE INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJV12SYA20 Sep 18, 2016
Transcatheter mitral valve implantation: Tendyne
Moat N et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00002 Mar 4, 2024
Catheter-based versus surgical mitral valve intervention: choosing between the red pill and the blue pill
Bagur R and McInerney A
free

10.4244/EIJV11SWA23 Sep 17, 2015
The Tendyne transcatheter mitral valve implantation system
Perpetua E and Reisman M
free

10.4244/EIJV13I9A153 Oct 11, 2017
Transcatheter mitral valve replacement: looking beyond the implant
Mylotte D
free

10.4244/EIJV11SWA19 Sep 17, 2015
Transcatheter mitral valve implantation: a brief review
Mylotte D and Piazza N
free
Trending articles
69.996

10.4244/EIJV13I12A217 Dec 8, 2017
Swimming against the tide: insights from the ORBITA trial
Al-Lamee R and Francis D
free
59.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
57.6

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
38.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00912 Oct 7, 2024
Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention
Almajid F et al
free
15.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01050 Jul 15, 2024
Durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Ternacle J et al
free
Chat with Cory
Hello , I'm Cory and I will do my best to answer your questions about this article. Please remember that this is an experimental feature, and that I'm still learning.
What was the initial valve implanted in the patient and when did it occur?
What was the reason for excluding surgical intervention?
How did the authors overcome the issue of the upper free-flow segment of the standard SAPIEN 3 valve?
What are the conflicts of interest reported by the authors?
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved