Subscribe

Flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00299

Splitter - a novel device for leaflet modification in transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation procedures

Yair Feld1, MD, PhD; Shlomo Lewkowicz2, DSc; Tami Fogel2, BSc; Arthur Kerner3, MD

More than 12% of Americans ≥65 years old suffer from aortic stenosis (AS)1. Transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) implantation (TAVI) has become an established treatment for severe AS and is performed in growing numbers of patients. It is estimated that >300,000 TAVI procedures are performed globally each year. Nowadays, low-risk patients who undergo TAVI have a longer life expectancy than the implanted valve’s lifespan. Therefore, more and more valve deterioration cases are expected to be seen, in which redo-TAVI will be required.

A high percentage (35-71%) of patients are unable to undergo a valve-in-valve TAVI procedure due to the high associated risks of sinus sequestration, coronary occlusion, or prevention of future coronary reaccess2. If the orifice of the two coronaries is located behind the leaflets of the aortic valve, there is an immediate risk of obstruction of the blood flow into the coronaries when the cusps of the replaced valve are pushed by the new implant34.

The projection for the next 10 years is for the number of valve-in-valve procedures to increase by 400% (courtesy of P. Généreux, et al). It is expected that once the device is approved, cardiologists will opt to cut out a “window” for blood flow in all “critical” cases of TAV-in-TAV (where there is a clear risk of obstruction) as well as in many “marginal” cases in order to ensure adequate blood flow to the coronaries.

The Splitter device (HVT Medical) performs leaflet modification by cusp splitting and partial leaflet excision before TAVI in surgical aortic valve (SAV) and TAV procedures to reduce the risk of coronary occlusion (Moving image 1). The Splitter creates an intentional U-shaped excision of the valve’s cusp tissue by a steerable catheter with an electrocutting wire loop running inside a cutting head that mimics alligator jaws. The U-shaped track is 12x3 mm; however, the actual opening in the leaflet is somewhat larger (Figure 1F). It is operated by two handles (Figure 1A) placed on the bedside and connected to any standard electrosurgical generator.

The procedure is guided by fluoroscopy and echocardiography (Moving image 2 and Moving image 3). The catheter rides a standard guidewire for TAVI; hence, it is streamlined and completely integrated into the TAVI workflow (Figure 1A, Figure 1B, Figure 1F). The device is designed to steer through the aortic arch curvature (Figure 1C, Figure 1G, Figure 1H, Moving image 3).

The Splitter was tested for proof-of-concept by utilising 3 methods. First, bench tests of the cutting mechanism were carried out on various types of tissues, such as processed pericardium, ex vivo calf/pig valve leaflets, an ex vivo human heart (Figure 1F) and explanted calcified human cusps (2-4 mm thick) with several calcification “bumps” (Figure 1I, Figure 1J). Second, bench testing took place on a pulsating silicone human heart model (Figure 1C). Third, in vivo testing with a longer Splitter device was carried out via the abdominal aorta to test the steering of the cutting head and grasping of the selected cusp in a live animal (Figure 1D, Figure 1E, Figure 1G, Figure 1H).

The next set of tests are planned with the full-size system in pigs via femoral access to demonstrate device safety and usability.

Currently, there are few other devices for valve leaflet modification in development or in clinical phases. The Splitter offers several advantages over these devices, including: (1) precise control of the cutting site, (2) stationary and stable grasping jaws during excision (no pulling forces), while a running wire with electrical energy performs a precise, U-shaped excision; (3) the excised tissue is safely trapped in the jaws and removed through the catheter without embolisation; (4) it confirms a successful cut; (5) it can be fully integrated into the TAVI workflow.

The Splitter offers a novel mechanism for the leaflet modification armamentarium prior to TAV-in-TAV/SAV and enables expansion of the options for structural interventions for AS patients.

Figure 1. The Splitter system. A) An image of the Splitter system. B) A close-up image of the Splitter's cutting head. C) The Splitter inside a human heart silicone model, showing how the cutting head reaches the valve. D) The Splitter's cutting head as demonstrated by ICE during a porcine study (short-axis view). E) The Splitter's cutting head echo image during a porcine study (long-axis view). F) Precise excision of leaflet tissue and creation of a large U-shaped window in the cusp, demonstrated during an ex vivo test on human heart tissue. G) The Splitter's cutting head placed on the right coronary cusp as demonstrated by fluoroscopy imaging during a porcine study. H) Fluoroscopy image of the cutting head grasping a pigtail next to the right coronary cusp during a porcine study. I) Explanted human calcified leaflet (native). J) The same human calcified leaflet after cutting with the Splitter; the U-shaped window and the excised tissue are clearly observed. ICE: intracardiac echocardiography; LV: left ventricle; RA: right atrium

Conflict of interest statement

A. Kerner and Y. Feld are the founders of HVT Medical. S. Lewkowicz is CEO of HVT Medical. T. Fogel is an employee of HVT Medical.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Moving image 1. Animation of Splitter delivery, deployment and cutting procedure.

Moving image 2. Echocardiography video of the leaflet captured by the Splitter in an animal study on a porcine model (with Doppler of aortic flow demonstrating AR due to cusp grasping).

Moving image 3. Cine-fluoroscopy video of the Splitter’s cutting head reaching the right cusp via abdominal aortic access during a porcine animal study.


References

Receive our newsletter


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00344 Aug 5, 2022
First dedicated transcatheter leaflet splitting device: the ShortCut device
Tchétché D et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11I5A100 Sep 22, 2015
Further refining the technique: new concepts in TAVI research
Aldalati O and MacCarthy P
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00012 May 12, 2023
ACURATE neo2: jack of all trades or master of none?
Sinning J
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01048 Apr 5, 2019
The evolution of device technology in transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Bourantas C et al
free

10.4244/EIJV8I5A94 Sep 28, 2012
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: new developments and upcoming clinical trials
Bourantas C et al
free
Trending articles
69.996

10.4244/EIJV13I12A217 Dec 8, 2017
Swimming against the tide: insights from the ORBITA trial
Al-Lamee R and Francis D
free
59.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
57.6

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
38.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00912 Oct 7, 2024
Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention
Almajid F et al
free
15.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01050 Jul 15, 2024
Durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Ternacle J et al
free
Chat with Cory
Hello , I'm Cory and I will do my best to answer your questions about this article. Please remember that this is an experimental feature, and that I'm still learning.
What is the Splitter device and how does it work?
1What are the key advantages of the Splitter device compared to other leaflet modification devices?
3What are the projected trends in the number of valve-in-valve procedures and the expected adoption of the Splitter device?
6How does the Splitter device aim to address the risk of coronary occlusion in TAVI procedures?
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved