EAPCI Column

DOI:

EAPCI Focus on the EAPCI Scientific Documents and Initiatives Committee

An interview with the Chair Giulio Stefanini

Figure 1

Figure 1.

What is the role of the committee?

Any proposal for scientific documents received by the EAPCI must be submitted to the Scientific Documents and Initiatives Committee (SDIC) for approval prior to their development. Together with my Co-Chair Nieves Gonzalo and committee members, the SDIC reviews all document proposals and makes approval or rejection recommendations. These recommendations are then reviewed and confirmed by the EAPCI Executive Committee. The responsibilities of the committee include the screening and validation of solicited and unsolicited documentation proposals as well as the identification of topics suitable for EAPCI scientific documents. Once the topic has been selected and approved, the committee is responsible for the administrative supervision and coordination of Writing Groups, coordination of the declarations of interest process for appointed authors as well as coordination of the review process.

How do EAPCI scientific documents benefit the community?

The key benefit of EAPCI scientific documents is to provide guidance for clinical management on topics not covered, or not covered in sufficient detail, in the existing or upcoming ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Whilst their topics and scope should not overlap with those of guidelines, scientific documents may complement them by providing more in-depth information in specific areas that cannot be expanded upon in guidelines. Our scientific documents evaluate scientific evidence, explore expert consensus in a structured way and, typically, include very practical advice for daily management of the topics discussed.

How are topics chosen and how can EAPCI members contribute?

Any EAPCI member may submit a proposal for a scientific document; any proposal received is subject to the robust and transparent review process of the SDIC followed by the EAPCI Executive Committee. Furthermore, one of the roles of the SDIC is to identify areas of unmet need and propose these topics to the EAPCI Executive Committee for consideration.

What are the upcoming topics?

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cancer
  • Follow-up strategies in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  • Day-clinic care for percutaneous cardiovascular interventions
  • Sex-related considerations in mitral and tricuspid valve interventions

News

  • Attending ESC Congress 2023 in Amsterdam from August 25th-28th? Come to the ESC Plaza and find out more about EAPCI.
  • Not yet an EAPCI member? Join online https://www.escardio.org/EAPCI
Volume 19 Number 5
Aug 7, 2023
Volume 19 Number 5
View full issue

Suggested by Cory

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00116 Dec 15, 2025
Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in secondary mitral regurgitation
Rodés-Cabau J et al

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00757 Dec 15, 2025
Watchman FLX versus Watchman 2.5 for left atrial appendage closure: a propensity score-matched analysis
Galea R et al

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00489 Dec 15, 2025
Predictors of underexpansion after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the ACURATE neo valve
Alvarez-Covarrubias H et al

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00319 Dec 15, 2025
Phenotyping coronary microvascular dysfunction endotypes using invasive exercise stress testing
Rahoual G et al

Letter to the editor

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00868 Dec 15, 2025
Letter: Balancing, timing, and efficiency in tricuspid TEER
Ktenopoulos N et al

Reply to the letter to the editor

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00944 Dec 15, 2025
Reply: Balancing, timing, and efficiency in tricuspid TEER
Baldus S et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved